Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Showdown in the South China Sea: How did we get here?

(CNN)Dotted with small islands, reefs and shoals, the South China Sea is home to a messy territorial dispute that pits multiple countries against each other. 
China's "nine-dash line" -- its claimed territorial waters that extend hundreds of miles to the south and east of its island province of Hainan -- abut its neighbors' claims and, in some cases, encroach upon them. 
    Tensions have ratcheted up as China has reclaimed some 2,000 acres of land in a massive dredging operation, turning sandbars into islands equipped with airfields, ports and lighthouses. 
    On Tuesday, China said it warned and tracked the U.S.S. Lassen, a destroyer, as it came close tofive of its artificial islands in the South China Sea's contested waters.
    Cui Tiankai, Chinese ambassador to the United States, told CNN Tuesday that the U.S. patrol was "a very serious provocation, politically and militarily."

    Who claims what?

    Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam all dispute sovereignty of several island chains and nearby waters in the South China Sea -- with rival claims to the Chinese interpretation. 
    To the north, in the East China Sea, China is also locked in territorial disputes with Japan and South Korea. 
    China is actually relatively late to the party when it comes to occupying territory in the Spratlys, which Beijing calls the Nansha islands. 
    Taiwan first occupied an island in the archipelago after World War II, and the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia followed suit, and all have built outposts and airstrips on their claimed territory, according to Mira Rapp-Hooper, a Senior Fellow in Asia-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS). 
    The Philippines, which lies geographically closest to the Spratlys, has troops stationed in the area
    China started its occupation of reefs and islands in the area in the late 1980s.
    Vietnam also disputes China's administration of the Paracel islands -- and last year saw tensions surge as its northern neighbor installed exploratory oil rigs in the region. 

    What's China been building? 

    Satellite imagery from 30 March, 7 August 2014 and 30 January 2015 shows the extent of Chinese progress in building an island at Gaven Reefs in the Spratly Islands.
    In 2014, China began massive dredging operations centering on three main reefs in the Spratly Islands -- Fiery Cross, Subi and Mischief Reef. 
    It has reclaimed 2,000 acres in less than two years -- more than eight square kilometers, or around 90 football fields. 
    In September, during his trip to Washington, President Xi Jinping said China wouldn't "militarize" the islands but is building three airstrips that analysts believe will be able to accommodate bombers, according to satellite images analyzed by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). 
    In June, China's foreign ministry said it would soon complete the controversial land reclamation.
    However, it also added that it planned to build facilities on the artificial islands it has created and these would perform several tasks -- including military defense.

    How has the U.S. responded?

    The U.S. government takes no position on the territorial disputes in the South China Sea but it has called for an immediate end to land reclamation.
    It also sails and flies its assets in the vicinity of the reclaimed islands, citing international law and freedom of movement.
    In May, it flew over the islands, triggering repeated warnings from the Chinese navy and on Tuesday raised the stakes by sending the Lassen to within 12 nautical miles of the reclamations.
    Chinese military confronts U.S. spy plane
    Chinese military confronts U.S. spy plane 06:20
    "We will fly, sail and operate anywhere in the world that international law allows," a U.S. defense official told CNN following the latest U.S. sortie into the disputed zone. 
    "U.S. Freedom of Navigation operations are global in scope and executed against a wide range of excessive maritime claims, irrespective of the coastal state advancing the excessive claim," the official added.
    And while it is currently China that is protesting the U.S. Navy's maneuvers, according to Gregory Poling, director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, the U.S. has used these operations to contest claims made by nearly all the countries surrounding the South China Sea, meaning not just China but also the Philippines -- a treaty ally -- as well as Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam.

    What does international law say?

    According to Poling, international maritime law doesn't accord 12 nautical miles of "territorial waters" to artificial islands -- only natural features visible at high tide. 
    This was the principle being tested by the U.S. Navy when it went within 12 miles of Subi Reef on Tuesday. It called the patrol a "Freedom of Navigation" operation. 
    Before China's recent land reclamation, both Subi and Mischief reefs were submerged at high tide, while a sandbar was visible at high tide at Fiery Cross Reef, which could make its legal status more ambiguous, he added. 
    Poling said under maritime law, artificial islands were not usually afforded the 12-mile territorial zone and that the U.S. Navy deliberately chose to send the destroyer near Subi Reef for this reason.

    What's at stake here?

    The area is potentially rich in natural resources and some areas, particularly around the Malaysian coast and off Vietnam have proven oil and gas fields with billions of barrels of oil and equivalent.
    While unexplored, much of the disputed area around the Spratlys is believed to be potentially rich in oil and other natural resources,
    It's also about China's position within the region and globally, maintaining control over islands that it claims is its "indisputable sovereign territories," as Chinese officials say.
    The current posturing in the area has led to heightened tensions between the world's preeminent military powers, and in May Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell told CNN that the confrontation indicates there is "absolutely" a risk of the U.S. and China going to war sometime in the future.

    China warns US after warship sails by man-made islands

    The United States has vowed to continue more naval patrols as China has reacted angrily after a US naval warship sailed through disputed waters of the South China Sea, saying the move threatened its "sovereignty".
    A Chinese guided-missile destroyer and a naval patrol ship shadowed and gave warnings to the US warship "according to law", China's defence ministry said on Tuesday.
    The US patrol was a "coercive action that seeks to militarise the South China Sea region" and an "abuse" of freedom of navigation under international law, it added.
    China will resolutely respond to any country's deliberate provocations," the ministry said in a statement that gave no details on precisely where the US ship sailed.
    China's foreign ministry
    Beijing said that the USS Lassen illegally entered Chinese territory when it sailed early on Tuesday near the Spratly, or Nansha, group of islands.
    "The action ... threatened China's sovereignty and security interests, endangered the safety of staff and equipment on those islands and harmed regional peace and stability," Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said.
    Lu said Washington should "correct the mistake immediately" to avoid "further harm" to Chinese-US relations.
    US Defense Secretary Ash Carter, testifying on Tuesday to the Senate Armed Services Committee, said that the USS Lassen had passed within 12 nautical miles of a Chinese artificial island.
    'Extremely irresponsible'
    China's Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Yesui summoned US Ambassador Max Baucus, telling him that the patrol was "extremely irresponsible," the foreign ministry said.
    It earlier said the USS Lassen "illegally" entered waters near islands and reefs in the Spratlys without the Chinese government's permission.
    "China will resolutely respond to any country's deliberate provocations," the ministry said in a statement that gave no details on precisely where the US ship sailed.
    In Washington, US State Department spokesman John Kirby told a regular briefing that "Setting this aside, the US-China relationship is vitally important and one we want to see continue to improve and to grow for the benefit of both our countries, not to mention the region".
    Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, 12-nautical mile limits cannot be set around man-made islands built on previously submerged reefs.
    Pentagon officials say the US regularly conducts freedom-of-navigation operations around the world to challenge excessive maritime claims. The US Navy last went within 12 miles of Chinese-claimed territory in the Spratlys in 2012.
    Freedom of navigation
    "Freedom of navigation operations serve to protect the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea and airspace guaranteed to all nations under international law," a Pentagon spokesman, Commander Bill Urban, told DPA news agency on Tuesday.
    One Minute South China Sea
    Meanwhile, a US official told AFP news agency that the US Navy will send more warships to sail close to the artificial islands.
    The Philippines, which has filed an arbitration case with the United Nations questioning China's sweeping claims over the sea, led US allies in the region in hailing the warship's passage through the disputed waters.
    "I think everybody would welcome a balance of power anywhere in the world," Philippine President Benigno Aquino said.
    China has been on a reclamation and construction spree in the disputed South China Sea despite objections by other claimants, including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan.
    China claims nearly the entire South China Sea, a key shipping lane, with overlapping claims to the sea's potentially rich mineral resources.

    US army blimp wreaks havoc after breaking free from military facility

    A high-tech US army airship broke free from its mooring on Wednesday, wreaking havoc as it floated from Maryland to Pennsylvania, dragging its 10,000 foot long cable behind it and knocking out power to thousands.
    The US military scrambled two armed F16 fighter jets to keep watch as the blimp traveled into civilian airspace after coming loose shortly after mid-day from its mooring station at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, a US army facility 40 miles north-east of Baltimore.
    It came down several hours later in two parts in Montour County, Pennsylvania, the US military’s North American Aerospace Defense Command (Norad) told reporters. 
    First, the tail portion of the blimp detached and came to the ground “with no reports of other damage or casualties”, navy captain Scott Miller said. The remainder of the blimp also grounded itself. 
    The balloon’s tether hit power lines and caused outages near Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania. As it hovered over Pennsylvania, police warned residents to contact the police if they spotted the airship. 
    PPL Electric Utilities Corp said that as of 3.45pm there were about 17,800 customers without power in Columbia County, Pennsylvania, with another 9,000 out in Schuylkill County. 
    It was not immediately clear how the blimp – which is known as JLENS, short for: Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System – became detached from its mooring station at Aberdeen Proving Grounds. 
    The office of Pennsylvania governor Tom Wolf released a statement to let the public know the state was monitoring the situation and discussing it with federal officials, state police and emergency officials and the national guard. 
    The blimp is described by manufacturer Raytheon as a “cruise-missile fighting radar blimp”.
    The US army deployed the JLENS system earlier this year at Maryland’s Aberdeen Proving Grounds to identify threats in the north-east. It consists of two blimps which fly up to 10,000 feet in the air. 

    Raytheon said the helium-filled balloons can protect an area about the size of Texas. 

    Advertisement
    While the system is meant to detect suspicious activity in the air near Washington DC and New York City, the system failed to identify a Florida mailman who flew a gyrocopter onto Capitol Hill earlier this year
    As of December 2014, the government had spent $2.8bn on the system and had approved another $43.3m to test the system. 
    Lee Fang, an investigative reporter at The Intercept, noted that Raytheon on Tuesday posted a job opening for someone to watch the airship.
    Two JLens balloons broke from their moorings in Iraq in 2006, according to WikiLeaks’ Iraq war logs. Both balloons were thought to have drifted towards Iran, but their final destination remains unclear.

    Processed meat causes cancer? Eat llama instead, says Bolivia's health ministry

    Bolivia's health ministry has recommended eating llama instead of processed meat, after the World Health Organisation warned an excess of red meat could cause cancer







    File photo: Llama standing in the Andean Highlands, Bolivia. Bolivia's health ministry has recommended eating llama instead of processed meat
    File photo: Llama standing in the Andean Highlands, Bolivia. Bolivia's health ministry has recommended eating llama instead of processed meat Photo: Alamy
    And Vicky Aguilar, director of the alimentation and nutrition department in the ministry of health, said that llama was a healthy alternative to red meat. 
    "We have very good meat such as llama with a very low fat content, which helps – but should be consumed in moderation," she said. 

    Llama meat has switched from being something that poor farmer would eat to being highly-sought after at fashionable gatherings. Llama carpaccio is said to be a particular delicacy and Andean cuisine – in particular Peruvian – is considered to be imaginative and full of flavour. 
    "All excesses can cause harm, however," said Ms Aguilar. "Unfortunately we have poor dietary habits. 
    "Bolivia has a variety of agricultural land where vegetables and fruit can grow in abundance. What is missing is consumers who know that they need to vary their diet and feed themselves properly." 
    Jose Luis Ramos, spokesman for Bolivia's federation of meat workers, said that internal consumption of processed meat had not fallen since the WHO issued their warnings
    "Sales are as usual," he said. "People are more concerned about genetic modification." 

    US still isolated at UN General Assembly over Cuba embargo



    The United Nations General Assembly has almost unanimously voted to condemn the US embargo on Cuba, in the first such resolution since US-Cuban diplomatic ties were restored earlier this year. 
    The motion won more support than it has done in the past, with 191 members of the 193-member body voting in favour.
    Only the US and Israel opposed the resolution, which is non-binding.
    The US had earlier said it may abstain if the resolution's language differed significantly from previous ones.
    The UN General Assembly (UNGA) has voted in favour of the resolution condemning the US embargo on Cuba for every year since 1992.
    Last year, the US and Israel voted against the resolution, while three countries abstained.
    In July, the US and Cuba reopened embassies in each other's capitals and restored full diplomatic ties.
    Relations had been frozen since the early 1960s when the US broke links and imposed a trade embargo on Cuba.
    US President Barack Obama last month told UNGA he expected the US Congress to ultimately lift the embargo.
    However, the move is opposed by the Republicans, who control Congress.
    Image copyrightAP
    Image captionAccording to the BBC's Will Grant in Havana, there had been speculation that the US might abstain from the UN vote this year, thereby isolating the US Congress in the eyes of the world - and pressurising them to lift the embargo.
    However, the US deputy ambassador to the UN, Ronald Godard, said shortly before the vote that the US would not abstain, as the Cubans had not sufficiently changed the language of the motion.
    "We find it unfortunate that despite our demonstrated bilateral progress the Cuban government has chosen to introduce a resolution that is nearly identical to those tabled in years past," he said.
    "Nevertheless, the United States will not be bound by a history of mistrust."
    Cuba's Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez told the assembly that the "lifting of the blockade" would "give some meaning" to the progress achieved recently, and "set the pace towards normalisation".
    The resolution welcomes the renewed ties and recognises Mr Obama's "expressed will" to end the embargo.
    Our correspondent says the vote is unlikely to derail the process of normalisation between the US and Cuba on its own. 
    He says Mr Obama still wants to see the embargo lifted, and behind the scenes, the Castro government has appreciated his support in that endeavour.

    Venezuela ex-prosecutor speaks out on Lopez 'sham trial'

    A former Venezuelan prosecutor has accused the government of jailing an opposition leader "because they feared his leadership".
    Franklin Nieves, who prosecuted Leopoldo Lopez, was speaking on CNN in Miami after leaving Venezuela.
    He said that Mr Lopez was innocent and the evidence against him was false.
    Mr Lopez, who led anti-government protests last year, was sentenced in September to almost 14 years in jail for inciting violence.

    'Wrongly convicted'

    Mr Nieves left Venezuela last week and is reportedly seeking asylum in the United States. 
    Venezuelan Attorney-General Luisa Ortega sacked Mr Nieves on Monday for actions "contrary to his oath of office".
    Image copyrightReuters
    Image caption
    On Tuesday, Mr Nieves told Spanish-language news channel CNN en Espanol that "Leopoldo [Lopez] is innocent".
    "They jailed him because they fear his leadership," he told CNN's Fernando del Rincon on the programme Conclusiones. 
    Asked if Mr Lopez should be free, the former prosecutor said: "Yes, indeed, because after examining each and every piece of evidence it was shown that this person had at no point made even a single call to violence."
    Mr Nieves said that video footage taken from protests at which Mr Lopez spoke showed him "always calling on his supporters to remain calm".
    Image copyrightAP
    Image caption
    Mr Lopez handed himself in to the authorities on 18 February amid mass anti-government protests in which 43 people - from both sides of the political divide - were killed.
    He has always denied inciting violence and his supporters say he is a political prisoner. 

    'Pressure and fear'

    Asked why he had not spoken out before Mr Lopez was sentenced to 13 years and nine months in prison, Mr Nieves said that he had remained silent "out of fear and because of the pressure exerted by each one of our bosses on prosecutors working at the national level".
    He then explained that the pressure filtered down from President Nicolas Maduro and National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello through the attorney-general to individual line managers who got prosecutors to act "on the whims" of the authorities.
    Image copyrightReuters
    Image caption
    Mr Nieves went on to allege that he was instructed to arrest Mr Lopez to "take him out of the political game" and that the order came from President Maduro.
    He also alleged that the police report on which Mr Lopez's arrest order was based was "fictitious and invented" and that the witnesses in the case were "false" as they had been told to testify in a certain manner.
    Mr Nieves also alleged that the case of Mr Lopez was not unique. 
    "There are innumerable cases in which people were investigated and innocent people detained," he told Mr del Rincon. 
    On Monday, Ms Ortega dismissed Mr Nieves' allegations, saying that "at the state prosecutors' office we don't pressure anyone".
    She added that Mr Nieves had given in to "pressures from foreign and domestic elements" although she did not specify what pressures those were.

    At least five dead as whale-watching boat sinks off Canada

    Five people died after a whale watching boat with 27 people on board sank off Vancouver Island on Sunday and one person remained missing, Canadian authorities said.

    The vessel made a mayday call late Sunday afternoon on what was a calm, clear and sunny day off the tourist community of Tofino, a popular destination for whale watchers on Canada's West Coast, the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre said.
    Lt.-Cmdr Desmond James, a spokesman for the rescue agency staffed by Canadian military and Coast Guard personnel, said late Sunday that the agency's search concluded with five people dead, 21 rescued and one person missing. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police will take over the search for the person who remains missing.
    "As of right now the case has been turned over to the RCMP and it's a missing person file," he said. "Fortunately, we did manage to rescue 21 people."
    The boat, the 20-meter Leviathan II, was partially submerged 8 nautical miles (12 nautical kilometers) west of Tofino.
    Tofino's mayor described the town's mood as tense but commended residents for their quick aid in the rescue effort.
    "Everybody's heart is just breaking for what's going on here and wanting to be as helpful as possible," Josie Osborne said in a telephone interview late Sunday.
    Coast Guard vessels and search and rescue aircraft had searched into the night for survivors.
    Boats from the nearby Ahoushat First Nation arrived first on the scene, said aboriginal Councilor Tom Campbell. He was on the waterfront and watched as rescuers brought several survivors ashore.
    "Their looks tell the whole story," he said by phone from Tofino. "You can't describe looks on people that are lost. They look totally lost - shocked and lost."
    John Forde, who runs The Whale Centre, another whale watching operation, responded to the call for help and was told the search was for four or five missing people.
    The ship that went down was operated by Jamie's Whaling Station, Forde said. He said he had no idea how it could've sunk.
    "Over the course of a season and years we take out thousands and thousands of people on these trips in conditions similar today," Forde said. "I have no idea what the issue was or what actually happened."
    Forde said Jamie's Whaling Station was one of the first of its kind off Vancouver Island and had been around for many years.
    Tofino fishing guide Lance Desilets said at least 12 rescue boats were already out on the water when he arrived on the scene after responding to the call for help.
    "I saw a lot of personal belongings, a long diesel slick and the top 10 feet of the Leviathan II sticking out of the water," Desilets said. "It's a sad day for our community."
    It wasn't the first fatality on the whale watching company's record. In 1998 one of its vessels capsized during an excursion, sending all four people on board into the water. The operator and a passenger died.
    On Sunday, five ambulances were dispatched and several off-duty paramedics went to the dock to help, said Jenn Hamilton, a spokeswoman for British Columbia Emergency Health Services.
    Many of the survivors were taken to Tofino General Hospital and some were already discharged Sunday night, said Valerie Wilson, a spokeswoman for the Vancouver Island Health Authority.
    Canada's Transportation Safety Board said it was investigating the boat's sinking.
    Joe Martin, a member of the Tal-o-qui-aht tribe, was near the dock when rescue boats went out.
    The ship was on the far side of Vargas Island in Clayoquot Sound, an area that Martin said can get really rough, but was not on Sunday.
    "It wasn't even blowing hard," he said. "This is the largest boat in Tofino and I was really surprised that it went down."

    Colombia President Santos offers truce with Farc

    Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos has said that he wants to enter into a bilateral truce with the Farc rebel group on 1 January 2016.
    Despite having been engaged in peace talks with the left-wing rebels for almost three years, the government had always refused to declare a ceasefire.
    The Farc, who have been observing a unilateral ceasefire, have repeatedly called on the government to join them in the truce.
    The conflict started in 1964.

    Next step

    Speaking at a public event promoting science, Mr Santos called on the Farc and government negotiators "to make the effort so between now and 31 December we can wrap up the fifth point [on the peace agenda], which is how to end the conflict, so that we can declare an internationally monitored bilateral ceasefire from 1 January".
    Mr Santos had in the past refused to enter into a bilateral ceasefire with the rebels arguing that during previous negotiations, the Farc had used it to re-arm and re-group.
    An estimated 220,000 people have been killed in the 51-year armed conflict, the longest-running in the Western Hemisphere.
    Farc and the government negotiators started official peace talks in the Cuban capital, Havana, in November 2012.
    Since then, they have reached agreement on the political participation of the rebels, land rights, drug trafficking, and most recently, transitional justice.
    Transitional justice - how rebels who have committed crimes will be punished - had been considered one of the thorniest issues on the agenda.
    When the two sides announced a deal on the issue on 23 September, President Santos flew to Cuba and shook hands with the Farc leader known as Timochenko.
    The president also set a deadline of six months, until 23 March 2016, for the signing of a final peace agreement.